Minnesota Network for Progressive Action

About Comments
The mnpACT! blog welcomes all comments from visitors, which are immediately posted, but we also filter for spammers:
  • No active URLs or web links are allowed (use www.yourweb.com).
  • No drug or pharma- ceutical names are allowed.
  • Your comment "Name" must be one word with no spaces and cannot be an email address.
You should also note that a few IP addresses and homepage URLs have been banned from posting comments because they have posted multiple spam messages.

Please be aware we monitor ALL comments and reserve the right to delete obvious spam comments.

Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites

Listed on BlogShares

site search

Site Meter
  Progressive Political Blog

Progressive Politics in Minnesota, the Nation, and the World

Talking About Sexual Harassment At The Capitol

Posted: 11/12/17 17:21

by Dave Mindeman

Let's talk for a bit about the recent sexual harassment charges that have come to public attention.

It is a complicated subject and you can take it in many directions depending on your personal perspective. And let's face it, in our flawed society the expectations from male and female perspectives can be vastly different.

John Gilmore, a conservative Republican writer, wrote a column for Alpha News that brings up some interesting points as he criticizes everyone involved. He says that there is too much politics involved while emphasizing ONLY political points of view. A bit hypocritical himself, but interesting none the less.

The article has a Republican bias but a good self examination of the Republican response as well.

But let's discuss how these allegations are being portrayed. Sexual harassment in the work place is always an uncomfortable and unnecessary problem. Relationships are complicated enough - don't let the work place become part of that complication. That should be a basic tenet as we delve into this.

A lot of people ask the question, why now? And I would respond, if not now, when? This is not a new problem at the legislature. Many rumors abound about this issue and Twitter and Facebook have opened up whole new avenues of asking for trouble.

The timeline is interesting. As Gilmore points out, Schoen and Corning being outed at about the same time, makes it a bipartisan issue and should be solved in a bipartisan manner.

But look at the party responses. DFL Senators are in a one vote minority. Each Senator is something they cannot afford to lose - yet, the calls for resignation from DFL Senate and Party officials was swift and immediate for Schoen - and for Cornish when it happened a little later. But on the Republican side, condemnation of Schoen was immediate, but when the R was involved there was this unusual parsing of words and shifting positions. Daudt acknowledged there was a problem but seemed unwilling to commit to any action. After a day or two of fidgeting, he decided to have an outside body handle it so he could wash his hands of it politically.

Gilmore gives an interesting take on GOP Chair Jennifer Carnahan's response....

"Carnahan needlessly exposed the Republican Party of Minnesota to charges of hypocrisy in calling for Schoen to resign but not Cornish. When challenged she went silent, except to leave the state to write gibberish on the sand beaches of California while celebrating her birthday. You know that person who uses exclamation points too much, as in all the time? That's her.

Unfortunately, Carnahan is the embodiment of low level management types: full of unwarranted self confidence but manifestly without the talent to be promoted. Her incompetent leadership, tone deaf messaging and abominable press releases have given many observers cause for concern in the upcoming election cycle."

It really was a one sided response and coming from a woman, it seemed all the more hypocritical. Carnahan's public comments were woeful and very unfulfilling as a guide to any kind of remedy.

Gilmore also argues that Schoen's physical actions were more egregious than Cornish's sexual innuendos; but both of these men have a checkered history in this regard which will probably keep this story going for awhile. And which could lead to other revelations -- because you know they are not alone in this regard.

I remember when Melissa Hortman publicly stated her disdain for her "reluctance" ......"to break up the 100 percent white male card game in the retiring room." An obvious reference to ignoring and dismissing the conversations being made by women legislators on the House floor ...especially women of color.

That was a symptom of the much bigger problem of sexual harassment.

Women have not, for a long time, been taking seriously as legislators; even though by and large they get a lot more things done for their constituents than any male representative. This is not just a Minnesota thing, it is nationwide and in the Halls of Congress. It is difficult for them to get elected, it is difficult for them to be heard, and it is difficult for them to advance. The glass ceiling may have cracked but it is still intact.

One more point I'd like to make here. I do not believe that it is an accident that both Schoen and Cornish come out of law enforcement. As we have seen with the Black Lives Matter protest, officers of the law expect different treatment. They are so accustomed to deference in their job that they tend to expect it in every other avenue of life they pursue. I'm sure that Schoen and Cornish were surprised to be called out on their behavior. They are not used to be questioned about things they do - and as we generally see, they get too much benefit of the doubt on the job.

There are many aspects of this that should be examined. And I think the call for a Task Force on Sexual Harassment is a great place to start. If both Republicans and Democrats are serious about addressing this issue, then the Task Force should get support from everyone.

Maybe even Jennifer Carnahan can agree on that.
comments (0) permalink

A Modest Proposal

Posted: 03/24/16 16:17

by Alan Anderson

Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell says he will block President Obama from nominating a Supreme Court justice this year. He said we should wait until a new president is elected so we can "let the people decide" on the next justice. He said that since the president is going to leave office, the responsibility for choosing a new justice should be left to the newly elected president. As he stated, "let the people decide". He basically suggested that a "lame duck" president shouldn't choose a new justice....the next president should do that.

Well, perhaps we should apply his reasoning to our government, too. Since one-third of the Senate is up for elections, we shouldn't allow those senators to vote on legislation since they may not be in office next year. So, let's let the people decide and have "lame duck" senators withhold their votes until next year.

And, of course, all the members of the House of Representatives are up for election next year. So they, too, are "lame ducks." So, let's apply Mitch McConnell's requirement and "let the people decide." Let's bar all the members of the House from voting on anything....until they have been reelected.

Of course, such a modest proposal is preposterous. It would shut down the government and bar anything from being done in the House. But, Republicans have shut down the government before. So, for them, no big deal.

But wait, there may be a solution. Where there is a tie vote in the Senate, the Vice President can cast the deciding vote to break the tie. Perhaps, where there is a tie vote on the Supreme Court, the President should cast the deciding vote. There, we just solved the problem. That should make Mr. McConnell happy!!!!
comments (3) permalink

Why Hold The Ed Budget Hostage Over Pre-K?

Posted: 05/18/15 10:01

by Dave Mindeman

Why would an education bill get vetoed over Pre-K? Why would a governor be so insistent on one program? What is the reason.

Well, there are several reasons and recent studies on Pre-K education show some very compelling arguments.

First, Pre-K early learning benefits are very evident...

One of the most far-reaching recent studies found marked increases in children's skills across five states: Michigan, New Jersey, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and West Virginia. Overall, children in state pre-k posted vocabulary scores that were 31 percent higher and math gains that were 44 percent higher than those of non-participants. These gains placed pre-k children three to four months ahead of non-participants, largely due to participation in the state program. The greatest gains occurred in print awareness, where participants had an 85 percent increase, which suggests these outcomes strongly predict later reading success.

Second, there is the benefit in regards to the achievement gap. Minnesota has struggled for years with this obvious blemish on our record - the achievement gap. One of the reasons that Governor Dayton is standing so firm on Pre-K is that it can be a great benefit to that long standing achievement gap issue....

In the High/Scope study, low-income black children randomly selected to receive the comprehensive preschool program showed impressive long-term results regarding educational progress, delinquency, and earnings. Seventy-seven percent of these youngsters eventually graduated from high school, compared with 60 percent from the control group. In adulthood pre-k participants were also less likely to be arrested for violent crimes, more likely to be employed, and more likely to earn higher wages than those in the comparison group.

But there is a third major benefit and this is where the House GOP argument crashes and burns....there is a huge benefit in cost savings...

High-quality pre-k programs also provide substantial cost savings to federal, state, and local governments. Numerous studies have shown a reduced use of special education services and lower grade retention among pre-k participants. In the Abecedarian study, for example, 24 percent of pre-k children received special education services, versus 48 percent of the control group. Given the high cost of these interventions pre-k can produce significant financial benefits for school districts.

Numerous studies have proven this cost benefit analysis. For every $1 spent on Pre-K the cost savings benefit ranges from $4 up to a $10 return. That is not throwing money at the problem - that is investing in the issue for a guaranteed return.

These are the reasons that Pre-K has become the core issue in this year's budget. That is why this Governor has drawn his line in the sand. This is not just about money, this is about taking a stand on Minnesota's future.

Looking ahead to our next generation, what we do now on Pre-K could put Minnesota into the nation's top tier for education, economic growth, and stability in our budgets.

That's worth fighting for...and worth standing alongside Governor Dayton to achieve.
comments (1) permalink
« First « Previous


« April 2018 »
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29

Latest posts


(one year)




RSS Feeds

RSS 0.91
RSS 2.0

Powered by
Powered by SBlog
Copyright © Minnesota Network for Progressive Action. All rights reserved. Legal. Privacy Policy. Sitemap.